My Bullshit Review Scale


Part of why I read reviews is to decide whether or not I should play/buy a game.  Games cost money and with a regular 9-6 job my time is limited in what I can play.  I have to make that count.  Also, I like reading reviews! If I’m going to play a game from start to finish and then talk about it, I should also post my own formal review of it.  Makes sense, right? But what makes for a good review?

A good review should be able to present a game objectively while still emitting character, personal taste and enjoyment (or lack thereof) for the title.  Still though, what one reviewer says about a game is totally different from what another might say.  Which brings me to my next point.

Something else to consider is relevance.  Not whether a game is relevant to you (if it wasn’t relevant to you, you wouldn’t be reading it) but relevant to the writer.  If you like RTS games and want to know if an upcoming game is worth checking out, someone that mainly enjoys games like Battlefield 3 or Call of Duty may not present the game in the greatest light.  

In this age of Internet everyone is a reviewer.  We all have different guidelines for what truly makes a game “great” and so it’s a good idea to know how your reviewer makes up their score.

This being said, I present to you the scale with which I quantify the greatness of the games I play- my Bullshit Review Scale.

My Bullshit Review Scale

Scores are based on three categories:


Each of these categories gives a max of 3 points which can total as much as 9. The 10th point comes from what I like to call a “bullshit” point but we’ll get to that in a bit.

Original image courtesy of the author
Original image courtesy of the author


Is the game fun? This often gets confused with “addictive.” While both definitely factor in here, a game can be very addictive but not necessarily as much fun.  For example, Tiny Wings is addictive but not as fun as Half-Life 2. Not even close. Even though one is a tiny, mobile game and the other is a big blockbuster FPS, the comparison is still fair simply because they’re both games and hey- that’s what we’re talking about here!

Other factors I consider- gameplay mechanics, controls, multiplayer, addictive/fun, replay value


I consider the technical prowess of the game’s engine as well as its visuals- both in-game and in-menus.

Though, both are greatly valued here, it’s important to distinguish between “graphics” and “visuals.” Graphics are the power behind the realism of what you’re looking at.  Whereas the visuals of a game refer to art style without regard to technical power/ability.

For example, the graphics for a game such as Borderlands are not that impressive, however its visuals- it being cell-shaded -make it quite colorful, but at the same time less edgy. This lends itself well as it’s a way lighter game than Call of Duty or Battlefield with its humor and cartoon-like characters.

Framerate is also an extremely important part of graphics.  The framerate of a game, if dropped below optimal levels, can take you out of a game in every way.  Having to wait for a game to catch up to where you subconsciously expect it to be already has you thinking about technical issues when they should remain in the background.

Do the visuals match the theme of the game? Does the game look realistic? Lighting? Buggy? Does the framerate hold up well?


Story is the backing for so many awesome things in video games. Without it, you’d have no context for your missions in Call of Duty, no reason to cure the genophage in Mass Effect, and no reason to get Ellie to safety in The Last of Us. The game would feel empty. We take story for granted but, theoretically, this is the reason you’re playing the game. If you feel motivated by something other than achievements or trophies, it’s usually tied to the story.

Story also extends to writing- everything from the written dialogue between the characters to the voice-acting to the way the music fits with what’s on screen and how the menu options are listed.

Is the story engaging? Original? Do the dialogue and plot make sense? Is the voice acting believable?


This idea of this point is to award the games you especially liked. It can be because all of the pieces came together really well or maybe the game has a special lasting appeal that keeps you coming back.  It could even be just because you’re a fan of the developer.  Really, any reason whatsoever.

But, dood!  Wait a minute! You didn’t mention music! I believe that music and sound design/mix, for the most part, help drive story.  A few exceptions aside, games aren’t designed around music/sound- they’re largely a visual medium.  So while music and sound is definitely significant to games, they serve mainly to immerse you in the story. 

So that’s it.  That’s where I come from when I talk about and/or review games.  What are your core factors in deciding if a game is “good” or not?

9 thoughts on “My Bullshit Review Scale”

  1. Nice post. When I decide on if a game is good or not, a good story and good characters is super important. Preferably both, as a game can have a great story, but boring characters, and just not do it for me. In the end, characters may be more important to me because they’ll make me come back to a game. Once I know the story, I know it, but do I want to play again and pay the characters a visit, or do I not care to even see them again, either? Of course, a game has to be fun, too. And when it comes to graphics, it depends on what the console is capable of. “FFVII” looks horrible, but it’s an old game, so what can you expect? I was, however, disappointed by “Star Wars: The Force Unleashed” on the Wii. Yeah, the Wii doesn’t have super good graphics, but I’ve seen it do much better than that.

    I also hate games that are buggy. Bad frame-rates and skipping music and voice acting. It really ruins the enjoyment of a game. So does bad graphics in a console capable of better and bad voice acting. Bad voice acting may be even worse. You can ignore the character’s ugly, little face, but if they sound horrible, it reminds you all the more that you’re playing a game and they’re not real. Games with good voice acting bring the characters to life, making such games so much better.

      1. Yeah, bad voice acting can be, well, bad. It can be hard to play the game when every character speaks like a messed-up robot. Unless they are, in fact, supposed to be messed-up robots.

  2. As always, what an excellent article from you guys. I tend to forget about the music as well as it some how merges with the visual aspect but then that’s also unfair to they guys who worked so hard to get the sound and music right.
    For my reviews, the game-play needs to be solid, frame rate is a big factor to me, story and characters have to develop or at least be interesting and captivating the whole way through. graphics and visuals don’t need to be perfect just needs to look good to me and no obvious flaws.

    Some games like Batman: Arkham City have the “x-factor” because i always come back to it and i honestly don’t know why. It’s so good

    1. I agree, frame rate is important. I get quite annoyed when games look choppy or slow down, and glitches in the graphics can be a problem, too. Gameplay is more important to me than characters and story, though it is the games with good gameplay AND good characters and story that are my favorite games of all time. Fun games can’t compete with a fun game with a great story and characters.

  3. Good post, I like your rationale. As for me, gameplay overrules every other element. I’ll tolerate a bad story (or no story) if the game plays well. Story and characters are the second most important to me, since not even the most engaging story will endear me to a game with garbage gameplay.

    1. I agree with you. I can’t play a boring game, even if the story is good. I, personally, find “KH: Chain of Memories” to be a bother to play, but I like the story and characters, so I’ll just read the manga or watch the cut scenes on Youtube. A video game is just that, a game, and if we don’t have fun playing it, then it can be hard to even get to those good cut scenes in the first place.

Add to the Discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s